Tue. Sep 17th, 2024
BC Treaty process Canadian Indigenous Canadian policies Canadian Politics

B.C. Treaty Process Controversy: Canadian and Indigenous Perspectives in Land Claims and Aboriginal Title (BC First nations Treaty Discussion)

By foundationhkpltw Dec 8, 2021

The B.C. Treaty Process has often been very controversial. First of all, many First Nation communities have dropped out or refused to participate based on their belief that the process extinguishes titles favouring the B.C. government, allowing the provincial government to continue developing lands at the expense of their territories and cultures. Secondly, there is always a significant difference between what the First Nation Peoples see as their “Original Title” to the land and its resources and the Canadian and B.C. legal notion of ‘Aboriginal Title.’ For these reasons, many consider the B.C. Treaty Process to have failed at settling issues of Aboriginal title.  The debates are ongoing, preventing further negotiations from continuing.

Modern Land Claims and First Nation Perspective

Reconciling the Canadian legal understanding of Aboriginal title with First Nation peoples’ knowledge is not a straight forward task.  The idea that Aboriginal title would be a proprietary right to the land stands in contrast to First Nation peoples’ concept of land ownership.In their concepts, the creator provided the land to them and their future generations. They have argued that they retain inherent land rights to territories given their creator. The lands are not owned, but rather the land and the people exists in a reciprocal relationship. In this regard, Indigenous activists note that Aboriginal title cannot be surrendered but only shared — “First Nation Peoples retain inherent land rights to traditional territories.”

Based on the First Nation viewpoint, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal People concluded that Aboriginal title does not include “the right to alienate or sell land to outsiders, to destroy or diminish lands or resources, or to appropriate lands or resources for private gain without regard to reciprocal obligations.” Summarizing this viewpoint, the “cede, release, yield up and surrender” written in the land treaties constitute an agreement upon the conditions by which the land would be shared instead of a surrender of Aboriginal title.

Although the British Columbian government created B.C. Treaty Process to reach agreement, the disagreement with First Nations regard to Aboriginal title makes the process fruitless. As you can see, the Canadian legal understanding of the Aboriginal title is that it is a burden on the Crown’s underlying title.

In this understanding, the British Columbian government continues to interpret Aboriginal title to be something that can be ceded or transferred only to the Crown. This legal interpretation accepts the Crown’s underlying title as a given, and did not require the Crown to prove or validate its claim to sovereignty. Many First Nation communities are uncomfortable with the legal interpretation made by the government because they believe the interpretation assumes the Crown’s sovereignty without questioning its legitimacy.

Who is right? I think reconciling the Canadian legal understanding of Aboriginal title with First Nation understanding remains a great challenge.

Bibliography

Crowe, Keith. “Comprehensive Land Claims: Modern Treaties”. The Canadian Encyclopedia, 11 July 2019, Historica Canada. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/comprehensive-land-claims-modern-treaties. Accessed 16 December 2021.

Dyck, Lillian E., et al. A Commitment Worth Preserving: Reviving the British Columbia Treaty Process. Canada Senate, Ottawa, Ont., 2012.

Malone, Molly and Libby Chisholm. “Indigenous Territory”.  The Canadian Encyclopedia, 05 July 2016, Historica Canada. http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/indigenous-territory. Accessed 16 December 2021.

Irwin, Robert. “Aboriginal Title”.  The Canadian Encyclopedia, 25 September 2018, Historica Canada. http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/aboriginal-title. Accessed 02 December 2021.

Hanson, Eric. “Aboriginal Title.” Indigenous Foundations. First Nations and Indigenous Studies UBC, 2009. Accessed 16 December 2021.

Raibmon, Paige, “Unmaking native Space: A genealogy of Indian Policy, Settler Practice, and the Microtechniques of Dispossession” in Alexandra Harmon, ed. The Power of Promises: Rethinking Indian Treaties in the Pacific Northwest. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2008: 56-85.

Tennant, Paul, Aboriginal People and Politics: The Indian Land Question in British Columbia, 1849-1989 Vancouver: UBC Press, 1990.

Woolford, Andrew. “Negotiating Affirmative Repair: Symbolic Violence in the British Columbia Treaty Process.” Canadian Journal of Sociology, vol. 29, no. 1, 2004, pp. 111.

This is an opinion article; the views expressed by me. Follow him on Twitter: @hkpltw And @Terry_Terence97

By foundationhkpltw

Related Post

Canadian policies Canadian Politics

Unlocking Insights: The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) and Canada’s Economic Odyssey

foundationhkpltw Mar 20, 2024
Canadian history tradition Canadian Indigenous Canadian policies Canadian Politics

Pulling up the roots of poverty and planting the seeds of change – Part 3

foundationhkpltw Mar 1, 2024
Canadian Indigenous Canadian Politics poverty reduction Social organization relations

Pulling up the roots of poverty and planting the seeds of change – Part 2

foundationhkpltw Feb 10, 2024
8,712 thoughts on “B.C. Treaty Process Controversy: Canadian and Indigenous Perspectives in Land Claims and Aboriginal Title (BC First nations Treaty Discussion)”

  2. I have read your article carefully and I agree with you very much. This has provided a great help for my thesis writing, and I will seriously improve it. However, I don’t know much about a certain place. Can you help me?

    Reply

  3. Cool. I spent a long time looking for relevant content and found that your article gave me new ideas, which is very helpful for my research. I think my thesis can be completed more smoothly. Thank you.

    Reply

  4. After reading your article, it reminded me of some things about gate io that I studied before. The content is similar to yours, but your thinking is very special, which gave me a different idea. Thank you. But I still have some questions I want to ask you, I will always pay attention. Thanks.

    Reply

  8. I may need your help. I tried many ways but couldn’t solve it, but after reading your article, I think you have a way to help me. I’m looking forward for your reply. Thanks.

    Reply

  9. There are some fascinating closing dates in this article but I don抰 know if I see all of them heart to heart. There may be some validity but I will take hold opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we wish extra! Added to FeedBurner as well

    Reply

  10. There are actually numerous particulars like that to take into consideration. That could be a great level to deliver up. I supply the ideas above as general inspiration however clearly there are questions like the one you convey up where the most important thing can be working in trustworthy good faith. I don?t know if finest practices have emerged round issues like that, but I’m sure that your job is clearly recognized as a good game. Both boys and girls feel the influence of only a moment抯 pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.

    Reply

  11. Can I just say what a aid to find somebody who truly is aware of what theyre speaking about on the internet. You undoubtedly know easy methods to convey a difficulty to light and make it important. Extra folks have to read this and perceive this facet of the story. I cant imagine youre not more popular because you definitely have the gift.

    Reply

  12. Nice post. I be taught one thing tougher on completely different blogs everyday. It’ll always be stimulating to read content material from different writers and observe a little something from their store. I抎 want to use some with the content on my blog whether you don抰 mind. Natually I抣l offer you a link in your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.

    Reply

  13. There are some fascinating deadlines in this article however I don抰 know if I see all of them heart to heart. There’s some validity but I will take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we wish more! Added to FeedBurner as well

    Reply

  15. Spot on with this write-up, I actually suppose this website needs rather more consideration. I抣l most likely be once more to learn much more, thanks for that info.

    Reply

  16. An fascinating discussion is worth comment. I think that you must write extra on this topic, it might not be a taboo topic however generally individuals are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

    Reply

  17. Spot on with this write-up, I really suppose this web site needs far more consideration. I抣l most likely be again to learn much more, thanks for that info.

    Reply

  18. It抯 exhausting to search out educated people on this matter, but you sound like you realize what you抮e speaking about! Thanks

    Reply

  102. I discovered your weblog website on google and verify just a few of your early posts. Proceed to keep up the superb operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Seeking forward to reading more from you later on!?

    Reply

  103. There are certainly loads of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great level to deliver up. I supply the ideas above as basic inspiration but clearly there are questions just like the one you bring up the place an important factor will likely be working in sincere good faith. I don?t know if greatest practices have emerged around issues like that, however I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. Both girls and boys really feel the affect of just a second抯 pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.

    Reply

  104. A formidable share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing somewhat analysis on this. And he in actual fact purchased me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I really feel strongly about it and love studying extra on this topic. If attainable, as you turn into expertise, would you thoughts updating your blog with more details? It’s extremely useful for me. Big thumb up for this weblog submit!

    Reply

  106. Thanks so much for giving everyone a very special possiblity to discover important secrets from this blog. It is usually so nice plus packed with a good time for me and my office acquaintances to search the blog more than thrice in one week to find out the latest secrets you will have. And indeed, I am just usually satisfied with the superb opinions served by you. Some two points on this page are in fact the best we’ve ever had.

    Reply

  443. Эффективное воздухонепроницаемость внешних стен — прекрасие и экономическая выгода в вашем коттедже!
    Согласитесь, ваш дом заслуживает превосходного! Термоизоляция фасадов – не только решение для экономии на отоплении, это вложение средств в комфорт и стойкость вашего помещения.
    ✨ Почему изоляция с нами-профессионалами?
    Искусство: Наши специалисты – профессиональные. Мы все заботимся о каждой детали, чтобы обеспечить вашему домовладению идеальное тепловая изоляция.
    Цена изоляции: Мы ценим ваш средства. [url=https://stroystandart-kirov.ru/]Цена м2 утепление фасада дома[/url] – начиная с 1350 руб./кв.м. Это вложение в ваше комфортабельное будущее!
    Энергосбережение: Забудьте о потерях тепла! Наша технология не только сохраняют тепловую атмосферу, но и дарят вашему коттеджу новый уровень уюта энергоэффективности.
    Превратите свой домашний интерьер теплым и уютным и изысканным!
    Подробнее на [url=https://stroystandart-kirov.ru/]n-dom.ru/
    [/url]
    Не предоставляйте без внимания свой жилье на произвольное стечение обстоятельств. Доверьтесь нам-профессионалам и создайте комфорт вместе с нами-мастерами!

    Reply